By Bob Markus

They tell me there's more than one way to skin a cat. I've never had any desire to skin a cat and if I ever did, I doubt that I could figure out even one way to do it. Where would I start?
At the head? The tail? I imagine I'd start by calling a taxidermist. What brought about this odd musing was the news that Mark McGwire has been named batting coach by the St. Louis Cardinals. McGwire has avoided the spotlight ever since his non-testimony before Congress four years ago. He has done no interviews. Now it is going to be nearly impossible to avoid them. I'll guarantee you that on opening day of spring training next February there will be a record number of media members flying down to Florida, all wanting to know: did he or didn't he?

How McGwire responds--if he responds at all--could go a long way towards determining if he ever gets in the Baseball Hall of Fame. Because the men asking the question are the same men who vote for or against enshrinement and McGwire at the moment has a long way to go to win the 75 per cent approval he needs. In his first two years on the ballot, the former major league home run single season record holder has garnered less than 25 per cent.

There have been players in the past who have been left at the post in their early years of eligibility. The time honored way to gather support has been to go to the radio or TV booth and mingle with the electorate. It worked for Ralph Kiner; it worked for Lou Boudreau; it worked for Phil Rizzuto, all of whom were voted into the Hall of Fame after years of cozying up to the baseball beat writers. I don't mean to imply there was anything phony about their relationships with their fellow media members. It's just that, try as one might to remain objective, it's difficult to remain objective about someone you know and like.

I can't recall an example of a player gathering Hall of Fame votes by becoming a coach, but the possibility is there, just the same. McGwire will be in daily contact with many of the men who hold his fate in their hands. Whether he takes advantage of the opportunity remains to be seen. If he refuses to answer any questions about his alleged use of performance enhancing drugs, he can forget about the Hall of Fame. If he refuses to talk to reporters at all, he can forget about the Hall of Fame. I'm not saying that's right, I'm just saying that's the way it is. There are many voters, probably a majority, who believe that any records set while under the influence of artificial enhancement are invalid. To them, McGwire's rookie record of 49 homers for the Oakland A's back in 1987, his 70 homers in 1998 when he beat Sammy Sosa in their epic race to to erase Roger Maris' record of 61, his 583 career home runs all are tainted by his presumed use of steroids.

I personally doubt that McGwire was drugged up all the way back in 1987. There seems to be little doubt that he was using a steroid named androstenodione in '98 during the duel with Sosa. In fact, he left packages of the drug in his open locker where anyone could see them and he has admitted that he took the drug. But at the time androstenodione was neither illegal nor a banned substance in major league baseball. It wasn't until 2004, three years after McGwire had retired, that the United States government declared the drug a steroid and made it illegal.

It seems to me that McGwire's wisest course would be to tell anyone who asks that, yes, I did take androstenodione back in '98, but I didn't know it was a steroid and it wasn't a banned substance. Even if he 'fesses up, he's not going to get into the Hall of Fame within the next year or two. But eventually, if he stays around the game and gets more comfortble with the writers--and they with him--his time will come. Although their cases may all be different, there are three other players who should be watching the McGwire situation with interest. As it stands now, Barry Bonds, Sammy Sosa and Rafael Palmeiro share McGwire's plight. All of them are suspected steroid abusers, none has admitted it, and Palmiero explained away his one positive test by claiming he had been given a tainted B12 injection. He passed a lie detector test and never failed another drug test before or since so there is the possibility that he told the truth when he said, "I have never knowingly used steroids. Never."

Palmeiro will be the first of the three eligible for the Hall of Fame and as it stands now, he won't make it, despite the fact he is one of only four players ever to amass 3,000 hits and 500 homers. The other three, Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, and Eddie Murray, are all Hall of Famers. Next up will be Sosa with his 609 career homers balanced against his embarrassing corked bat fiasco, which muddies the water when considering whether he's telling the truth when he denies using steroids. Bonds will be the most difficult choice of all, since many consider him the greatest hitter in baseball history (I'll stick with Babe Ruth), but in the current climate the steroids issue outweighs any statistics, no matter how gaudy.

It won't be easy, but Mark McGwire has been given the opportunity to change all that. Meanwhile there are approximately 100 ball players who have yet to be outed after failing a drug test in 2003. Until we know more about them, I'm throwing the problem back in baseball's lap. As a Hall of Fame voter I don't think it's my responsiblity to determine who is or is not eligible for the Hall. That's baseball's responsibility and if baseball sees fit to put Mark McGwire's name on the ballot, I'm going to vote for him. Bonds, Sosa and Palmeiro, too.